One of the biggest mistakes I see in revenue operations is building internal processes that serve the business - but completely ignore the buyer.
They create pipeline stages that reflect their internal to-dos. They force reps to log activity in a way that doesn’t reflect how the customer actually progresses. They measure success in calendar months while their customers make decisions over quarters. They automate for convenience rather than for clarity.
And then they wonder why deal cycles drag, conversions drop, and teams burn out.
The truth is: your internal process is the buyer experience. And when it doesn’t mirror the customer journey, it creates friction on both sides; for your customers and your team.
When I say that RevOps needs to mirror the customer journey, I’m not just talking about using the same terminology. I mean that your entire revenue process - especially your sales process - should be designed around the milestones your buyer needs to reach to make a decision.
That includes:
Stages that reflect where the buyer is mentally and emotionally, not where your internal paperwork lives
Language that aligns with what the buyer is trying to learn or solve
KPIs that measure meaningful progress, not vanity activity
Automations and tools that help buyers move forward, not just reps check a box
When your internal systems are aligned with the way your buyers think, decide, and buy, everything flows better. There’s less confusion, less chasing, less pressure. And your buyers feel like they’re in good hands - because they are.
You don’t need a survey to tell you when your process isn’t aligned with your customer journey - the symptoms are everywhere:
A sales rep sticks to a generic slide deck even when the buyer is clearly asking for a tailored demo
Marketing sends nurture emails that feel totally off, because they’re triggered by lifecycle stage or generic campaign - not actual behavior or intent
Pipeline stages are bloated with steps like “Waiting for Internal Review,” which make sense to the business but don’t help anyone buy anything faster
Reps push deals to close before the buyer is ready, dangling last-minute discounts because their monthly quota is on the line
Internal handoffs fall apart, because everyone assumes “someone else” owns the next step
All of these are signs that the process was built for the seller - not the buyer. And they all add friction to the deal.
When I design RevOps systems, I start by asking a few simple questions:
What does the customer actually need to know, feel, and decide at each stage?
Where are they getting stuck, and why?
What’s slowing our team down that has nothing to do with helping the customer buy?
Sometimes the answer is structural: the pipeline has too many vague stages. Sometimes it's cultural: reps are pressured to close quickly rather than qualify thoroughly. Sometimes it’s technical: systems don’t talk to each other, so people rely on spreadsheets and memory.
But the fix almost always starts by realigning internal steps to external milestones.
One of my SaaS clients had a six-stage pipeline that had ballooned into 15. There were stages like "Waiting on Legal," "Pending Budget Review," and "Proposal Sent." None of those told the sales rep, or the manager, where the buyer actually was in their journey.
We restructured the pipeline to focus on buyer-facing milestones:
Intro Call Scheduled
👥 Milestone: Buyer is interested and qualified enough to schedule an intro
✅ Internal Tasks:
Pre-call research and discovery planning
Review ICP fit, account background, lead source
Build personalized agenda or key questions for call
Demo Call Scheduled
🖥 Milestone: Buyer wants to see the product in action
✅ Internal Tasks:
Tailor the demo to the buyer’s use case / industry
Confirm decision-makers will be present
Prep demo environment and walkthrough flow
Build talk track aligned with pain points uncovered in discovery
Proposal Review Scheduled
📄 Milestone: Buyer is ready to review pricing, scope, and next steps
✅ Internal Tasks:
Build and customize proposal based on demo feedback
Align with internal teams (legal, solutions, services, etc.)
Prepare proposal assets
🤝 Milestone: Buyer has reviewed the proposal but needs a final alignment step
✅ Internal Tasks:
Recap proposal, address open questions
Revisit scope, pricing, or optional add-ons
Confirm final decision-makers are aligned
Prep adjusted proposal or supporting materials if needed
Contract Review & Signing Call
✍️ Milestone: Final terms are agreed and signature is the next step
✅ Internal Tasks:
Generate final contracts
Confirm billing details, legal entities, contacts
Prep contract walk-through agenda
Pre-load deal handoff checklist for success/onboarding
That’s it.
We turned internal approvals and back-and-forth into tasks, not stages. Reps had clarity. Buyers had consistency and always knew what the next step was going to be. And the result? Their average deal cycle shrank from 120 days to under 60. Same product. Same team. Just better alignment.
Let’s talk about the elephant in the RevOps room: monthly sales quotas.
They’re common. They’re ingrained. And they’re one of the most buyer-hostile systems we’ve ever normalized.
Monthly quotas:
Force reps to push deals prematurely
Incentivize shortcuts over qualification
Pressure reps into offering discounts that devalue your brand
Create a panic cycle every 30 days - for reps and customers
Lead to higher burnout, lower trust, and more turnover
And the worst part? They don’t actually match how most customers buy - especially in software, services, or complex B2B solutions.
If your buyers take 60–90 days to make a decision, a 30-day sales window only works if you’re willing to pressure them or lie (“this deal expires in 3 days” is the new “my manager won’t let me”).
I’m a big believer in quarterly quotas, especially for RevOps-led orgs. Here’s why:
They give reps time to build real relationships
They reduce end-of-month desperation
They encourage reps to move deals forward instead of just closing fast
They align with real buying patterns, especially in higher-consideration deals
And let’s not forget: quarterly quotas also make for better forecasting. They reduce the spike-and-crash patterns in your pipeline, making your data more predictable and useful.
If you’re wondering whether your internal process is out of sync with the customer journey, look for signs like:
Deals dragging through too many stages
Low CRM adoption or inconsistent data entry
Too many "stuck" deals in vague or outdated stages
Sales and marketing saying different things to the same prospect
Reps feeling burned out or like they’re "winging it" every month
Those aren’t just ops problems; they’re experience problems. And they’re costing you revenue.
Process design should live with someone who understands the big picture — not just the sales pipeline, but how that pipeline connects to marketing and customer success. That’s why RevOps is the best team to lead the charge.
They can:
Audit the pipeline to remove friction
Realign lifecycle stages to actual buyer behavior
Design automations that move the customer forward
Build reporting that reflects meaningful milestones, not busywork
Coordinate cross-functional alignment from first touch to long-term success
If your revenue engine feels disconnected — if deals take too long, reps are throwing spaghetti at the wall, or customers seem confused — take one action this week:
Listen to five sales calls.
Not to evaluate the rep. Not to judge their close rate. But to observe the journey.
What’s the buyer asking?
Where do they get stuck?
Where does the rep help - or accidentally derail?
That’s where the real RevOps work begins.
When your internal process mirrors the customer journey, everyone wins.
Buyers feel seen. Reps feel empowered. And growth stops being a grind, and starts being scalable.